Pandemics and environmental risks are viewed as similar in terms of impact, representing an important wake-up call for decision makers. Mohamed Dabo reports
- Higher sickness rates leading to a reduction in workforces;
- Shutdowns in various countries, territories and states, which largely requires homeworking, leading to friction;
- Travel bans hindering international business;
- Issues with network capacity, cyber-risk and IT security.
These developments are particularly effective in the operational risk area, much like ESG risks. They can also exert additional impact on reputation, in case stakeholders’ expectations are not fully met, even after discounting for some crisis-induced goodwill.
Subsequently, business and liquidity risks are likely to surface, while demand for some banking services can decrease and customers can withdraw deposits.
The impact of change depends heavily on the industry
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalData- Government orders to shut down various businesses, such as restaurants, for an undefined period;
- Breakdown of supply chains, hitting global suppliers particularly hard;
- Massive decrease in demand, domestic and abroad.
Outside-in effects, which in turn affect banks due to the issues mentioned, can be noticeable through an increase in defaults.
These are expected to occur both in commercial as well as in retail banking, such as due to clients becoming unemployed. Also, an impairment of assets, including collaterals, must be expected because, for example, commercial real estate is difficult to rent in times of crisis.
Not only clients are negatively affected by Covid-19 however; the same can happen to outsourcing partners and suppliers of banks. In this case services are expected to be of reduced quality or fail completely.
Finally, similar to the transition risks that are described in connection with ESG risks, governments are exerting extensive influence on people and business.
This again both is expected to affect banks directly – if, for example, employees are put in quarantine – as well as their clients and suppliers – if, for example, additional business segments are forced to close.
The main difference between the Covid-19 crisis and ESG risks is in the relevant time frames.
While ESG risks are subject to a multi-year, largely transparently planned transition, interventions in the Covid-19 crisis are changing almost daily, with little predictability, forcing banks to adapt quickly to changing, unpredictable environments.
In the current pandemic, banks can only react quickly, mostly in an ad-hoc manner